Selecting CMIP6 GCMs for CORDEX dynamical downscaling: model performance, independence, and climate change signals.
Di Virgilio, G., J. Fei, E. Tam, N. Nishant, J.P. Evans, C. Thomas, M. Riley, K. Beyer, M. Grose, S. Narsey, F. Delage
Earth’s Future, 10(4), e2021EF002625, doi: 10.1029/2021EF002625, 2022.
Abstract
Global climate models (GCMs) are essential for investigating climate change, but their coarse
scale limits their efficacy for climate adaptation planning at the regional scales where climate impacts manifest.
Dynamical downscaling of GCM outputs better resolves regional climate and thus provides improved guidance
for climate policy at regional scales. Being expensive to run, downscaling uses a subset of GCMs, necessitating
careful GCM selection. This evaluation identifies a suitable subset of CMIP6 GCMs for downscaling over
Australia by assessing individual GCMs against three criteria: (a) performance simulating daily climate variable
distributions, climate means, extremes, and modes; (b) model independence; and (c) climate change signal
diversity. Over Australia, GCMs are generally biased cold (warm) for maximum (minimum) temperature, with
larger biases for minimum temperature. GCMs are generally wet biased, especially over the monsoonal north,
but dry biased over eastern regions. Most GCMs show larger biases for temperature and precipitation over
geographically complex, heavily populated eastern regions, relative to other regions. Evaluations identify a
distinct group of 11 GCMs that perform consistently poorly across climate variables, statistics, and timescales
with widespread, statistically significant biases, versus 13 GCMs that show consistent adequate-to-good
performance with substantially reduced errors. Assessment of model independence highlights the lack of
independence between several high-performing GCMs, particularly from allied modeling groups, demonstrating
the importance of careful ensemble selection when making selective samples of climate space. Once GCM
climate signal diversity is considered, 6–8 mid-to-high-performing, independent GCMs occupy the full range of
the future climate space and, thus, are suitable for dynamical downscaling over CORDEX-Australasia.
Key Figure
Figure 14. CMIP6 GCM climate change signals (2080–2099 relative to 1995–2014) over Australia for the subset of GCMs retained following the model performance
evaluation, and that simulated at least monthly tas (mean near surface air temperature) and pr (precipitation) for the SSP-3.70 scenario. Therefore, a small number
of GCMs that were evaluated/assessed for independence, but that did not simulate tas or pr for SSP370 (e.g., HadGEM3-GC31-LL and HadGEM3-GC31-MM) are
not plotted. Marker shapes indicate overall GCM performance; markers in (a) colored according to their global equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) values and (b)
independence rank. Red numbers in (a) represent the smallest Herger Method 1 set for that GCM; red numbers in (b) represent the smallest Herger Method 2 set for that
GCM.
This page is maintained by Jason Evans |
Last updated 23 April 2023