Evaluating the performance of a WRF physics ensemble over South-East Australia.

Evans, J.P, M. Ekström, and F. Ji
Climate Dynamics, 39(6), 1241-1258, DOI 10.1007/s00382-011-1244-5, 2011.


When using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) modelling system it is necessary to choose between many parametrisations for each physics option. This study examines the performance of various physics scheme combinations on the simulation of a series of rainfall events near the south-east coast of Australia known as East Coast Lows. A thirty-six member multi-physics ensemble was created such that each member had a unique set of physics parametrisations. No single ensemble member was found to perform best for all events, variables and metrics. This is reflected in the fact that different climate variables are found to be sensitive to different physical parametrisations. While a standardised super-metric can be used to identify best performers, a step-wise decision approach described here, allows explicit recognition of the “robustness” of choosing one parameterisation over another, allowing the identification of a group of “equally robustly” performing physics combinations. These results suggest that the Mellor-Yamada-Janjic planetary boundary layer scheme and the Betts-Miller-Janjic cumulus scheme can be chosen with some robustness. Possibly with greater confidence, the results also suggest that the Yonsei University planetary boundary layer scheme, Kain-Fritsch cumulus scheme and RRTMG radiation scheme should not be used in combination in this region. Results further indicate that the selection of physics scheme options has larger impact on model performance during the more intensive rainfall events.

Key Figure

differentiating performance of physics parametrisations

Figure 9: Box plots of the climatic mean metric split by physical parameterisation. The second row includes only models with the MYJ PBL scheme. The third row includes models with the MYJ PBL scheme and excludes those with the WSM3 microphysics scheme. The fourth row additionally excludes those containing the CAM radiation scheme

UNSW    This page is maintaind by Jason Evans | Last updated 31st January 2013